Sinclair Law Solicitors

  • Family Law Specialists
  • Expert Divorce Advice
  • High Quality, Dedicated Service

Call Us Today On: 01625 526 222

Click Here To Request YourFree Consultation
  • Home
  • Family Law
    • Divorce Settlements
    • The 4 Stages of Divorce
    • Pre Nuptial Agreements
    • Legal Separation
    • Cohabitation Agreement
    • LGBT Family Law
    • Child Arrangement Orders
  • Private Clients
    • Wills
    • Probate
  • Our Locations
    • Wilmslow
    • Bramhall
    • Cheshire
    • Alderley Edge
    • Altrincham
    • Manchester
    • Knutsford
    • Stockport
    • Hale
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Meet The Team
    • Careers
  • Testimonials
  • News
  • Contact
Sinclair Law Solicitors » Divorce & Family Law Blog » Mills v Mills Supreme Court Decision

Mills v Mills Supreme Court Decision

July 18, 2018

The latest in a saga of cases on Spousal Maintenance was decided by the Supreme Court on 18th July 2018. The outcome of Mills v Mills has been eagerly anticipated by family lawyers across the country.

Mr and Mrs Mills divorced in 2002 after 15 years of marriage. During their divorce proceedings, a settlement was reached, whereby Mr Mills was to pay Mrs Mills £1,100 per month in Spousal Maintenance.

In what the Court described as a series of unwise financial decisions, Mrs Mills lived beyond her means and ended up with no capital and debts of £42,000 by 2015. To make up the shortfall, and to cover her residential rental costs, Mrs Mills applied to court to have her Spousal Maintenance increased.

The first decision of the court was that it would be unfair to compel Mr Mills to pay for Mrs Mills rental costs, when there was a settlement in 2002 that gave Mrs Mills enough money to live mortgage free. The Spousal Maintenance was not increased.

Still struggling financially, Mrs Mills appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal allowed her appeal and increased the Spousal Maintenance due to her to £1,441 per month.

Mr Mills then appealed this decision to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court allowed Mr Mills’ appeal and approved of the judge’s original decision. There would have to be a very good reason in circumstances such as this to require a spouse to pay the other’s rent.

Although this particular case related to a narrow set of circumstances, the decision is significant as it places emphasis on divorced people being financially independent, rather than relying on their ex-spouse financially in years to come. There is a trend in judicial decision-making that supports this.

Filed Under: Divorce & Family Law Blog

  • Free Case Review:
    Meet with Sinclair Law to discuss your case

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Our Address

Sinclair Law Solicitors
Hawthorn House, 14 Manchester Road
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 1BG
Get directions
01625 526 222

Follow Us On Social Media

  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Frequently Asked Questions

Your current situation has probably generated many questions. Here are some short answers to questions you may have about Divorce, Separation Agreements, Property Division, Child Custody and more.

Latest Blog Posts

Sinclair Law Solicitors hosts breakfast networking event – New trust registration regime

Sinclair Law Sponsors the Royal Ascot Fillies & Stallions Charity Fashion Lunch 2022

© Copyright 2012 - 2022 Sinclair Hughes Limited trading as Sinclair Law Solicitors · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Complaints Policy · Terms Of Use · Cookie Policy · Sitemap
Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Membership Number 563485. Company registration number 7636223. VAT registration number 120625848.